Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Weronika Baszak vs Kathleen Kanev Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Baszak vs Kanev analysis and find out who is favored!
Weronika Baszak vs Kathleen Kanev Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Baszak 1 - 0 Kanev
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Baszak has won 43.78% of points on his second serve, while Kanev has won 45.1%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Baszak, in recent form, has won 50.71% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kanev has won 56.66%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.33% and 36.52% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Baszak has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kanev has saved 49.24% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Baszak has won 32% of matches played (W/L 8/ 17), with Kanev winning 41.67% (W/L 20/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Baszak has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 23/ 19), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 26% (W/L 9/ 26). Kanev has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 60/ 43), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 34/ 42).
- Player level: In the last year, Baszak has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 8/ 16), where as Kanev has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.22% of matches (W/L 19/ 26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Baszak winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Baszak winning 2 and Kanev winning 0. The last match between Baszak and Kanev was at the W15 Jerusalem, 12-05-2021, First, Hard with Weronika Baszak getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:26:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Baszak and Kanev have played a deciding set 0 times, with Baszak winning 0 times and Kanev 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Baszak winning 0, and Kanev 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Baszak has played against opponents with an average rank of 101.12 while Kanev has played against players with an average rank of 297.58.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Baszak has won 29% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kanev has won 31% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Baszak has converted 52.38% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kanev has converted 46.51% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
818
Rank
692
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
496
Rank
368
High
23
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
43% (50-65)
Career Total W/L
54% (135-117)
20% (1-4)
YTD W/L
35% (6-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$1,804
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Weronika Baszak | Kathleen Kanev |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:26:0 | 1:26:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (39/67) | 68% (42/62) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 82% (32/39) | 69% (29/42) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 43% (12/28) | 45% (9/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (24/62) | 34% (23/67) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats 
Weronika Baszak
Player
Kathleen Kanev
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
6
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
6
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Weronika Baszak | Kathleen Kanev |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 20% (1/4) | 35% (6/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 27% (3/8) | 41% (15/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 39% (35/55) | 47% (158/177) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) | 14% (1/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 56% (5/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.19 | 0.09 |
| Aces Total | 8 | 14 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.3 |
| DFs Total | 12 | 49 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:27:48 | 1:33:52 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 94.6 | 144.47 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (184/294) | 69% (752/1089) |
| 1st Serve W% | 55% (101/184) | 59% (440/752) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 40% (44/110) | 45% (152/337) |
| BPs Won% Total | 63% (10/16) | 47% (60/129) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (95/263) | 44% (477/1095) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 20% (1/4) | 38% (6/10) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 20% (1/5) | 38% (6/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 50% (2/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 25% (1/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 86% (7/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 14% (7/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 0% (10/0) |
Weronika Baszak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Demi Tran
Player
Weronika Baszak
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
Player
Weronika Baszak
52%
(
38 of
73)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
1
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
1
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
84
Total Points Won
58
|
3-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Justina Maria Gonzalez Daniele
Player
Weronika Baszak
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sara Cakarevic
Player
Weronika Baszak
49%
(
18 of
37)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Weronika Baszak
Player
Rebeca Pereira
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
77%
(
34 of
44)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
Player
Weronika Baszak
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve %
69%
(
18 of
26)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
57%
(
12 of
21)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
46%
(
13 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
29
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 0-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Weronika Baszak
Player
Olivia Bergler
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Weronika Baszak
Player
Prathyusha Rachapudi
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
102)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
10
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
47 of
102)
88
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vaidehi Chaudhari
Player
Weronika Baszak
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
26 of
39)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
38%
(
15 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
45
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Weronika Baszak
Player
Chelsea Fontenel
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
62%
(
16 of
26)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
13 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
36
Total Points Won
25
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Kathleen Kanev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Lauryn John-Baptiste
Player
Kathleen Kanev
65%
(
77 of
119)
1st Serve %
77%
(
90 of
117)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
52 of
90)
38%
(
16 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
43%
(
51 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
51 of
117)
119
Total Points Won
117
|
7-6(4) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Amandine Hesse
Player
Kathleen Kanev
54%
(
53 of
98)
1st Serve %
77%
(
69 of
90)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
40%
(
18 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
46%
(
45 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
90)
97
Total Points Won
91
|
6-2 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emeline Dartron
Player
Kathleen Kanev
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve %
75%
(
33 of
44)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
27%
(
3 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kathleen Kanev
Player
Hanna Bougouffa
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve %
74%
(
49 of
66)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
51%
(
47 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
87
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Katarina Zavatska
Player
Kathleen Kanev
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve %
74%
(
42 of
57)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lara Pfeifer
Player
Kathleen Kanev
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve %
54%
(
13 of
24)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
57%
(
8 of
14)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
23
Total Points Won
20
|
3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Robin Anderson
Player
Kathleen Kanev
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
47%
(
30 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kathleen Kanev
Player
Anna Bochoradze
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
58%
(
18 of
31)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
8 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
52
Total Points Won
14
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
Player
Kathleen Kanev
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
70%
(
28 of
40)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oceane Dodin
Player
Kathleen Kanev
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve %
50%
(
31 of
62)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Baszak Vs Kanev Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
